Not long ago I decided to write a piece about Boulder’s water supply to determine where it comes from and why it is so damn tasty. The aim of this blog it to answer once and for all an age-old question about Boulder’s allure, “Is there something in the water?“
Water, as you undoubtedly already know, is a controversial issue in thirsty Western states like Colorado. Yet, very few people actually know where their water supply comes from and how it is prepared for human consumption. As a public service, I decided to tag along with an University of Colorado geology class as they took a tour of Boulder’s Betasso water treatment facility. After hours of struggling to cobble together a mildly entertaining account of what I learned there, I realized that it is not easy to make public utilities exciting. Instead I will present the relevant information in quick, easy to digest bits of information for you to take or leave at your discretion. Our tour guide identified himself only as Randy (or maybe it was John). Most of the information presented in this blog comes from him but can be verified at the City of Boulder’s utility website.
—————————————
So it turns out that Boulderites like water, a lot. During the winter months, our usage averages 10 million gallons of water per day. And this, of course, is just a drop in the bucket (pun intended) of our average usage during summer months, which hovers about 28 million gallons per day. In 2009 alone, Boulder treated 6.2 billion gallons of water!
The city of Boulder meets the demand by treating water that comes from a variety of sources. The primary source for drinking water comes from the Silver Lake watershed and Barker Reservoir. These two sources account for the majority of the water the city consumes. The Silver Lake watershed is a protected source perched serenely above Nederland near the Great Divide and includes the Boulder-owned Arapahoe Glacier. The remainder of Boulder’s water comes from the Western Slope and the headwaters of the Colorado River. This water makes quite a journey before finding its way to your coffee pot. It is first piped under the Rocky Mountain National Park and then passes through Estes Park Reservoir. It then flows through Carter Lake before winding its way down to Boulder Reservoir through a network of canals.
There are two treatment plants that serve Boulder Valley, the Betasso Treatment Plant and the Boulder Reservoir Treatment Plant. The Boulder Reservoir treatment plant provides less water to the city than Betasso does because it requires energy to pump water from the plant into town. Conversely, the water from Betasso actually generates energy as it flows downslope, by virtue of the wonderful properties of gravity.
As of 2010, the Betasso Treatment Plant can treat about 60 million gallons of water per day! It does this through a long (and boring) process that involves coagulation, filtering, chlorinating, and adding fluoride. After treatment, the water is sent on down Boulder Canyon to your house. Along the way it, generates approximately 11 megawatts of electricity by turning a series of different turbines. As the water reaches the city, it is regulated by several giant holding tanks that act as capacitors. This buffer allows water to flow constantly without wasting any of it.
Workers remain at the treatment plant 24 hours a day 7 days a week to ensure the safety of the city’s water supply and that the quality of water never deviates from EPA standards. EPA standards, it turns out, are really high. Higher even than the standards used by the FDA to regulate bottled water. City water is probably cleaner and safer because it is not packaged in plastic which can leach BPA’s and other toxins.
As a friendly suggestion, I recommend that every citizen learn about where their water (and food) comes from. It is my belief that there is nothing more personal, more important to understand and regulate, than the things we put in our body. Take a trip to your own local water treatment plant and see for yourself. It is a worthwhile and educational experience –not to mention you get to see a lot of cool industrial pipes and equipment!
Tags: Boulder, Colorado, water
Category Speak Thunder, Water |
Have you ever bought a product because it was labeled ‘green’ or ‘eco’? I know I have. Hell, I have even bought environmentally friendly underwear! UNDERWEAR! It took me a while before I paused to question just how “green” or “eco” the products I was purchasing really were. Sure, that yoga mat I bought last fall from Wal-Mart was made from recycled rubber, but is it really good for the environment?
No. And neither is taking it for granted that it is sustainable to buy such products ad infinitum.
You might be asking yourself, why not? Why can’t we just make every product green and go on living as we have been living?
The quick answer here is that buying stuff sucks. A lot.
Consumption has many negative impacts on the world. A 2008 study by the World Wildlife Fund has found that humans are using about 30 percent more resources in a year than the Earth can actually produce and if consumption continues we will need two earths to support us by the year 2035! And on the other side of things, waste from consumerism is at an all time high. The Clean Air Council states on their website that each day the United States throws away enough trash to fill 63,000 garbage trucks. Moreover, almost 1/3 of that waste comes from packaging. Buying anything, green or not, contributes to resource depletion and waste.
Despite these and other facts, there is growing momentum in the US for more “green” products and businesses. Politicians and pundits go so far as to suggest that we can save the planet by simply consuming ‘green’ products. Meanwhile, environmental blogs amplify this message by mostly focusing their ‘reporting’ on eco-friendly products and the hot new eco-fashions. As an example of what I am ranting about, today on Planet Green (the Discovery owned TV station that purports to be a one-stop shop for all things “green”), I watched an episode of the World’s Greenest Homes. If you happened to watch it today like I did (say around 3:30 p.m. Mountain Standard Time), you too might have walked away assuming that the only way to have a sustainable home is to build a brand new, 5,000 square foot lake-front villa with a solar-heated driveway and wind-powered lazy susan.
However well-intentioned these people, magazines, and shows might be, they all miss the mark. Consumerism and consumption will never be a cure for environmental degradation. Purchasing and using eco-products may put-off full blown environmental collapse for an hour or two, but it will never reverse it or stop it.
Environmental degradation, as I see it, results from precisely this line of thinking. People want to change what they buy without changing their buying habits. This suits the good people who bring us green products just fine because they benefit from the belief that we can have anything we want sans guilt, sans deforestation, sans thinking.
The sleek packaging designs and clever marketing strategies of “green” companies seem to suggest that their products are the panacea for all sorts of things that ails our lovely planet. In reality, buying eco-products is nothing more than a token gesture. It is a pressure valve for those who have internalized the Earth’s suffering and are searching for a convenient release, one that allows them to keep living unsustainable lifestyles.
I am most concerned about the group of people out there who buy green products and then think that their work is done (you know who you are). This group uses their conscious shopping habits as rationale to ignore the bigger problems and to abstain from engaging in meaningful change. In fact, some studies, like one recently reported on by the New York Times, have shown that some people who buy green products can “act more miserly and thieving.” This study suggests that buying eco-products can actually diffuse peoples’ sense of responsibility. Presumably, this is because when they make these purchases they feel they have bought themselves a good karma pass along with their vegan doggie treats.
I bet I know what you might be thinking.
Let me first acknowledge that we all need to buy things from time to time. I confess that I buy something almost every day. And when we buy something new, it is most likely better to buy something labeled “green” or “eco” than it is to buy one of the cheaper non-conscious products. But we should also always try to remember that we have a moral obligation to do more for the world than simply shop our way to change.
Instead buying green products and assuming the job is done, I propose we have a frank conversation with ourselves about how serious we are about saving the planet. We need to ask ourselves if open spaces, wild animals, lush valleys, blue skies, clean water, and healthy people are worth giving up some of that stuff we want. I would guess that most of us reading (or writing) this blog would answer ‘yes’ if they were posed this question directly. But before the question is even asked, all of our shopping habits inevitably answer it for us, and the answer is a deafening ‘NO!’.
Instead of buying green products let’s try to give stuff away. And when you see a cleverly labeled package of gummy worms, ask yourself “Do I need this?” and “Who will benefit from this purchase most, the people who make it or mother Earth?”
Tags: Capitalism, Consumerism, Consumption, Eco, Green Products, Logging
Category Environmental Ethics |
Not long ago I decided to write a piece about Boulder’s water supply to determine where it comes from and why it is so damn tasty. The aim of this blog it to answer once and for all an age-old question about Boulder’s allure, “Is there something in the water?“
